Smitty’s Chess Corner

Thought I’d post a pointer to Smitty’s Chess Corner. Smitty, a regular at the Metrowest Chess Club, is justifiably proud of recently breaking the 1600 rating barrier. He’s been writing a series of blogs about Metrowest Chess Club champions.

I added Smitty’s blog to my list of MCC blogs on the sidebar.

Posted in Chess | Comments closed

What Scientific American thought about chess in 1859

“A pernicious excitement to learn and play chess has spread all over the country, and numerous clubs for practicing this game have been formed in cities and villages. Why should we regret this? It may be asked. We answer, chess is a mere amusement of a very inferior character, which robs the mind of valuable time that might be devoted to nobler acquirements, while it affords no benefit whatever to the body. Chess has acquired a high reputation as being a means to discipline the mind, but persons engaged in sedentary occupations should never practice this cheerless game; they require out-door exercises—not this sort of mental gladiatorship.”

As quoted in Scientific American, July 2009

Posted in Chess | Comments closed

Two Knights Defense – Why 10.f3 instead of 10.f4?


(show chess board) (hide chess board)

Posted in Chess | Comments closed

Content with draw after long break from chess

I haven’t played or studied chess since early March, so I was content with this draw against a stronger player. I believe my earlier record against this player was 0-2.

I played some odd opening moves but found a tactic to pick up a pawn early. Then we exchanged quickly into an endgame. White found a tactic to regain the pawn in a way that left me with pawn structure weaknesses, but opposite-color bishops made the position rather drawish.


(show chess board) (hide chess board)

Posted in Chess | Comments closed

Nimzo-Indian 4.a3


(show chess board)(hide chess board)

Posted in Chess | Comments closed